BTN News: In a controversial incident that has ignited debates across social media and local communities, teachers at José Santos Valdez Nueva Secondary School in Durango, Mexico, destroyed several students’ mobile phones in a public ceremony. The drastic measure was taken as a punishment for bringing phones to school, violating the institution’s strict no-phone policy. Photos of teachers smashing phones with a hammer and burning them with gasoline were shared by the school on Facebook, causing widespread outrage. While the school claims parental consent and adherence to rules, many parents and the public see the act as an excessive form of punishment and a case of symbolic violence against students.
Phone Destruction Sparks Outrage: A Drastic School Punishment Goes Viral
During a recent flag ceremony at José Santos Valdez Nueva Secondary School in Durango, Mexico, teachers executed a surprising and severe punishment. Several mobile phones, along with other prohibited items like deodorants and caps, were publicly destroyed. The school claims this was done under the guidelines of their code of conduct, which was approved by parents at the start of the academic year. The ceremony, usually reserved for academic announcements, turned into a controversial spectacle that has since gone viral.
School Defends Actions, Citing Parental Consent and Regulations
The institution justified its actions by stating that all parents had agreed to the school’s strict disciplinary guidelines, including a ban on mobile phones. According to the school’s statement, parents had given their consent by approving the student manual at the beginning of the school term. The manual clearly states that mobile phones are not allowed, and violators would face consequences. The school argued that their actions were in line with maintaining order and minimizing distractions that affect learning.
Parents and Public React: ‘A Display of Savagery’ or Necessary Discipline?
Despite the school’s defense, the incident was met with strong criticism from many parents. Carlos RamÃrez, the president of the local Parent Association, expressed his disapproval, calling the destruction of the phones an act of “savagery.” He emphasized that while parents agreed to regulate the use of electronic devices, they did not expect such extreme measures. “It is not about a total ban; it’s a matter of regulation,” he noted in an interview with Milenio. RamÃrez added that there are other ways to enforce discipline without resorting to destroying personal property.
Debate Over Disciplinary Measures in Schools: Excessive or Effective?
The event has sparked a broader debate about the appropriateness of severe disciplinary actions in educational settings. Some support the school’s decision, arguing that strict measures are needed to enforce rules and maintain focus in classrooms. They believe that mobile phones are a significant distraction and that such punishment can deter future violations. However, others argue that destroying students’ belongings is a form of symbolic violence and sets a negative example, fostering fear rather than respect.
In a controversial incident that has ignited debates across social media and local communities, teachers at José Santos Valdez Nueva Secondary School in Durango, Mexico, destroyed several students’ mobile phones in a public ceremony. The drastic measure was taken as a punishment for bringing phones to school, violating the institution’s strict no-phone policy. Photos of teachers smashing phones with a hammer and burning them with gasoline were shared by the school on Facebook, causing widespread outrage. While the school claims parental consent and adherence to rules, many parents and the public see the act as an excessive form of punishment and a case of symbolic violence against students.
Phone Destruction Sparks Outrage: A Drastic School Punishment Goes Viral
During a recent flag ceremony at José Santos Valdez Nueva Secondary School in Durango, Mexico, teachers executed a surprising and severe punishment. Several mobile phones, along with other prohibited items like deodorants and caps, were publicly destroyed. The school claims this was done under the guidelines of their code of conduct, which was approved by parents at the start of the academic year. The ceremony, usually reserved for academic announcements, turned into a controversial spectacle that has since gone viral.
School Defends Actions, Citing Parental Consent and Regulations
The institution justified its actions by stating that all parents had agreed to the school’s strict disciplinary guidelines, including a ban on mobile phones. According to the school’s statement, parents had given their consent by approving the student manual at the beginning of the school term. The manual clearly states that mobile phones are not allowed, and violators would face consequences. The school argued that their actions were in line with maintaining order and minimizing distractions that affect learning.
Parents and Public React: ‘A Display of Savagery’ or Necessary Discipline?
Despite the school’s defense, the incident was met with strong criticism from many parents. Carlos RamÃrez, the president of the local Parent Association, expressed his disapproval, calling the destruction of the phones an act of “savagery.” He emphasized that while parents agreed to regulate the use of electronic devices, they did not expect such extreme measures. “It is not about a total ban; it’s a matter of regulation,” he noted in an interview with Milenio. RamÃrez added that there are other ways to enforce discipline without resorting to destroying personal property.
Debate Over Disciplinary Measures in Schools: Excessive or Effective?
The event has sparked a broader debate about the appropriateness of severe disciplinary actions in educational settings. Some support the school’s decision, arguing that strict measures are needed to enforce rules and maintain focus in classrooms. They believe that mobile phones are a significant distraction and that such punishment can deter future violations. However, others argue that destroying students’ belongings is a form of symbolic violence and sets a negative example, fostering fear rather than respect.
